With all due respect to Year2, he buried the lead. When evaluating the open letter to Tiger fans recently sent by Missouri’s athletic director, the Team Speed Kills co-author focused on Mizzou’s efforts to keep pace financially in the SEC arms race, which is all well and good, but inadequate attention was paid to this juicy tidbit:
Football Surface at Faurot Field - We will be replacing the existing artificial surface with a new artificial surface this summer (cost is approximately $1.5M). You'll see that the Tiger logo at mid field will be slightly larger, the SEC logos will be on the field, and the diamonds in the endzones will say "MIZZOU" vs. Missouri.
Wait . . . what? In honor of Mizzou’s move to the Southeastern Conference, the Tigers are uprooting their existing artificial turf and replacing it . . . with more artificial turf?!?!

Um, yeah, listen, Missouri; this is kind of awkward, but, well, we don’t do that around these parts. Yeah, all right, the SEC Championship Game is played on artificial turf, but that’s in a domed stadium, and Faurot Field isn’t a domed stadium, is it? (Checks to see if Faurot Field is a domed stadium.) No. No, it is not. So ixnay on the artificial urftay, O.K.?
Every down of college football ever played in Georgia’s Sanford Stadium, Auburn’s Jordan-Hare Stadium, Kentucky’s Commonwealth Stadium, and Louisiana State’s Tiger Stadium has been played on grass. But for flirtations with astroturf from the late 1960s to the early 1990s, Alabama’s Bryant-Denny Stadium, Tennessee’s Neyland Stadium, and fellow newcomer Texas A&M’s Kyle Field have been natural since opening in the 1920s; the same goes for Florida’s Ben Hill Griffin Stadium (which had an artificial surface from 1971 to 1989, but otherwise has boasted the real green stuff since 1930), South Carolina’s Williams-Brice Stadium (which broke up an admirable tradition of natural grass from 1934 forward with a fake field period from 1970 to 1982), and Vanderbilt’s Dudley Field (which opened with grass in 1922, switched to astroturf in 1970, and switched back to grass in 1999). Of the SEC’s current longstanding members, only schizophrenic Ole Miss (which permitted the Rebels to play on natural grass from 1915 to 1969, then again from 1984 to 2002, but employed artificial turf from 1970 to 1983, then again since 2003) appears to remain on the side of the infidels where synthetic surfaces are concerned. (My SB Nation colleagues from For Whom the Cowbell Tolls helpfully informed me that Mississippi State’s Davis Wade Stadium has natural grass, but, despite extensive Googling, it was not clear at press time whether Scott Field also went through a period of faking it, field-wise.)
This healthy disdain for the scourge of artificial turf is not unique to the league’s existing arenas, of course. Missouri’s Faurot Field featured a grass playing surface from the time it opened in 1926, through and including the 1984 season. After a decade spent playing on plastic, the Tigers went back to natural grass from 1995 to 2002. The fake stuff isn’t just contrary to conference tradition; it’s a deviation from most of Missouri’s football-playing history, as well. Frankly, switching from synthetic turf to grass then back to synthetic turf is the kind of thing schools that belong in the same conference as Texas do.
The fact that Bobby Petrino is for synthetic turf ought to be reason enough for being against it, but, even apart from matters of good taste, increases in injuries are widely believed to be associated with the fake stuff. Heck, folks at the University of Missouri have acknowledged the existence of problems associated with artificial turf.
Moreover, favoring fields that are the products of industrialization rather than preferring gridirons that are the fruits of agriculture is, if not downright un-American, certainly un-Southern, as the Vanderbilt Fugitive-Agrarians made plain; as a newly Southeastern institution whose university press published Mark Royden Winchell’s biography of Donald Davidson, y’all should appreciate that in Missouri. In short, Shug Jordan got it right: “College football is meant to be played on campus and on grass.” (Every team in the conference is clear on the fact that, when Coach Jordan said college football was meant to be played on grass, he was talking about the playing surface . . . every team in the conference, that is, except one.)
So good for y’all for getting rid of Faurot Field’s existing artificial surface this summer, but, please, as a fellow SEC partisan and a fan of the team that will welcome the Tigers to the league by playing in Columbia, Mo., next September 8, I’m begging you to lose the turf and put in grass, so we can play football the way God intended. A Southeastern Conference program is only as real as its field, and any team that hangs SEC banners in a stadium with an artificial playing surface is as unconvincing as a bleached brunette trying to pass herself off as a natural blonde; it’s hard to take either’s sincerity seriously, since the curtains don’t match the carpet.
Go ‘Dawgs!
1 recs | 67 comments
Trust me, we've tried natural grass...
…even the Marquis de Sod could not keep it from dying and clumping by November. Something about the airflow in the stadium or something. Trust me, you do not want natural grass at Faurot Field. At least, not unless we’re going to be playing every September…
Bill C. - February 21, 2012
Thanks, Bill.
Now that we’re all in the same conference together (or are about to be, at any rate), I’m sure the various ag schools involved can work together to help fix that problem!
T Kyle King - February 21, 2012
Ha...but...
…MARQUIS DE SOD!!
Bill C. - February 21, 2012
stadium as grass-killer
Bryant-Denny’s most recent expansion caused significant harm to the stadium’s fitness as a host for turf. There are sunlight and airflow problems. Their solution has been to use giant fans and frequent turf replacement.
NCT - February 21, 2012 via iPhone app
Can't we just say no home SEC games for Mizzou starting in November
I mean, if Slive & Co. are going to screw up the schedules for some of us, why not haze the noobies a bit more.
fotodog - February 21, 2012
Look at Mizzou's schedule. The SEC is already doing that.
We call it the Texas Stratagem.
Gaknar - February 22, 2012
it's "newbies"
mizzutgr - February 22, 2012
I live in Hong Kong
It’s the British spelling
fotodog - February 22, 2012
I don't suppose you could send Pitt (and the Steelers, I guess) a copy of your newsletter?
drothgery - February 22, 2012
On the other hand...
… Bama fans can’t poison FieldTurf. (I hope.)
vineyarddawg - February 21, 2012
Ye of little faith.
Aaron.50cal - February 22, 2012
I would have thought a place renowned for the interesting philosophies on the Hope Scholarship...
… would know better than to debate real vs. fake.
RPT - February 21, 2012
"Renowned," eh?
Do tell.
T Kyle King - February 21, 2012
I'm only working off stereotypes.
/returns to cooking meth and drinking Anhesuer-Busch products
RPT - February 21, 2012
Just checking, RPT.
I think you will find we are agreeably free of stereotypes regarding Missouri (the state and the program), with whom we have little history (though there probably will be a little ribbing about the 1960 Orange Bowl come September). I guess that means you’ll have to show us.
/yeahthat’sallIgot
//I’llshowmyselfout
T Kyle King - February 21, 2012
Re: Hope
I believe that the stereotype is that all the co-eds who attend UGA thanks to Hope use the excess Daddy money (damn East Cobb Snobs) to enhance themselves, hence the real vs fake argument. At least, I recall hearing that bandied about as a joke several years ago.
The984 - February 21, 2012
Yeah, I'd heard that said in passing, once, I think by Clay Travis, who's not the best source.
I just didn’t know that kind of thing made it as far as Missouri. Live and learn, I suppose.
While we’re on the subject, since today is Fat Tuesday, I’d like to share the following joke:
What’s the difference between Mardi Gras and Rodeo Drive?
At Mardi Gras, women will show you their real breasts in exchange for fake jewelry!
T Kyle King - February 21, 2012
Hell, I get surprised when foreigners outside of Tennessee and Florida even know what Hope is
Maybe he’s just doing diligent research about things with which to needle the opposing fan bases. If so, I applaud you, RPT. We will be more than happy to help fill you in on other stereotypes, both well known and less known, concerning your new athletic conference brethren. It’ll be like tutoring for math class, but instead of learning about trigonometric functions, you’ll learn that LSU fans smell like corndogs and that South Carolina can be blamed for one of the three most annoying athletic music “traditions.”
(GQ apparently thinks we’re known for duck hunting; I don’t recall knowing a single person in Athens who duck hunted)
The984 - February 21, 2012
The list is short.
1. Hey, your women are…. oh, never mind.
2. Hey, your college town is… oh, never mind.
3. Hey, your football program is… oh, never mind.
RPT - February 22, 2012
Well
you’re off to a good start!
andycapps - February 22, 2012
Other than the pond at the little Athens zoo, Lake Herrick, and Bear Creek
I’ve never even seen a duck in Athens. And I doubt you can hunt at any of those places.
There may be some ducks in Ben Burton park too. But I don’t think that’s a popular hunting spot either.
DocSkraynj - February 22, 2012 via mobile
"Popular hunting spot"?
depends on your desired game.
Mr. Sanchez - February 22, 2012
A few points about grass
First of all, you made a joke about Bobby Petrino (and I guess therefore Arkansas) being in favor of artificial turf, but you said Ole Miss is the only one with artificial turf. Where does Arkansas stand?
Secondly, as said in a comment, yeah. We have great ag departments. UGA’s certainly known for its. Miss State has a good one too. I would say Auburn has a good department, but when it came time to save a bunch of dying trees, they went to Starkville. We can definitely help out with choosing the proper type of grass breed/type/whatevertheycallthedifferentvariations.
Third, how will Les Miles feast on artificial turf? You’re messing with a burgeoning tradition here, MU!
Speaking of which (and unrelated to grass), seriously. You’re not MU. You’re UM. You’re The University of Missouri. Acronymize your name properly. For reals.
The984 - February 21, 2012
Great points on Les Miles and proper abbreviation, The984.
As for Ole Miss, I’ll admit I was being overly clever when I referenced Ole Miss as the only one of “the SEC’s current longstanding members” to have switched from turf to grass, then back to turf, but, yes, Arkansas (at whom I was taking a variety of jabs there) has done exactly the same thing. As of next fall, the SEC will feature eleven natural grass stadiums and three artificial turf stadiums. Missouri will be the only SEC East squad with a synthetic playing surface, while Ole Miss will be the only SEC school whose conference membership antedates the 1992 expansion without natural grass.
T Kyle King - February 21, 2012
We're just now leaving 100-plus years of Acronym Dyslexia.
University of Oklahoma? That’s OU!
University of Kansas? That’s KU!
University of Nebraska? That’s NU!
RPT - February 22, 2012
Totally agree, RPT.
Never got that whole thing. Never made a lick of sense to me. Welcome to the land of orderly abbreviations!
T Kyle King - February 22, 2012
My theory...
is that the letters/words are thought of almost separately, i.e., “K” “University” rather than “the University of K;” which, shortened, might be “K”- “U” (many ill-informed Kansas still call it “Kansas University”). Maybe I am wrong and it’s just a strange regional phenomenon, but it is even more extensive than so far noted:
—University of Colorado= “CU”
—University of Tulsa= “TU”
—University of Wichita (now Wichita State) was “WU” (and the mascot is still called “WUShock” or just “WU”)
Other states contiguous to those in question have not necessarily adapted this colloquialism (Texas, Arkansas, Illiinois, the Dakotas). Still, it is an intriguing regional idiosyncrasy. I would enjoy hearing more about how it was started and which school was first to do it.
rbubp - February 22, 2012
Speaking of abbreviations,
A good friend lived in South Carolina for a few years after graduation. He made the acquaintance of a guy originally from Kentucky who got a personalized South Carolina license plate to announce to the world that he was a “Kentucky boy”, and he used the USPS two-letter abbreviation for his home state. And, for the record, I heard tell he was both.
NCT - February 22, 2012
Gross!
RedCrake - February 22, 2012
What is this I don't even...
vineyarddawg - February 22, 2012
Indeed...
RedCrake - February 22, 2012
I'll be honest with y'all:
I’d have preferred a European soccer thread to Puke-.gif-a-palooza!
/tabled
T Kyle King - February 22, 2012
My thought
Since some of the universities in the midwest are older than the eastern ones, I thought they used MU, KU, etc. because there already was UM (Michigan), UK (Kentucky) to get their own identity.
wrestlemania - February 22, 2012
But it works so well for Florida...
MU'97 - February 22, 2012
How am I the first to rec this?
Mr. Sanchez - February 22, 2012
Why not UMO?
Just a thought.
NCT - February 22, 2012
I was thinking that as a compromise too
That would be quite similar to how we’re UGA and not UG and how UVA is UVA and not UV.
The984 - February 22, 2012
MU vs UM
I believe the university, when established back in 1839, was “Missouri University.”
(When my grandfather attended in the 20s, he said it always went by MU.)
During the second half of last century, they tried to rebrand the university system in Missouri with four distinct campuses. Thus, when I went to Mizzou, it was called “Univ of Missouri- Columbia” or UMC. There were also campuses “Univ of MIssouri-KC,” UMKC, “Univ of MIssouri-Rolla,” uh…UM-R and “Univ of MIssouri-St.Louis.” UMSL.(pronounced Uhhmm-Suhlll).
Those other schools/campuses are still in existence, but they dropped the attempt at state-wide branding effort and went back to the ‘MU’ for the Columbia (flagship campus.)
…of course, I may be wrong….
HlywdMizzou - February 22, 2012
Uhm-suhl?
Does that rhyme with Hansel?
vineyarddawg - February 22, 2012
yeah
sort of. and I’m pretty sure UMSL alums HATE it when you refer to their school as “Uhm-Suhl!”
HlywdMizzou - February 22, 2012
So what you're saying
Is that the Big 8/12 can be blamed for everything. Well at least you parcel out the blame rather than heaping it all on Texas like some of our other soon-to-be conference members.
I wonder why the Blank State Universities never got dyslexic. Or would it be improper to refer to KSU as SUK?
The984 - February 22, 2012
Well... There's SUNY.
But I think every other “state” university has followed the _SU name template.
DocSkraynj - February 22, 2012 via mobile
Simply because I like providing contrary evidence:
I’m fairly confident they’re just copying SUNY and CUNY, though.
vineyarddawg - February 22, 2012
Really meant to go with "almost every other" because I wasn't sure sure.
And I don’t know if Rutgers counts. All that state university stuff is like a subtitle. That’s like Auburn: That Collection of Ugly Brick Buildings Near Opelika.*
*may not be the official name of the school.
DocSkraynj - February 22, 2012
Hell I thought Rutgers was in New York.
longboard8 - February 24, 2012
SUNY actually makes sense
The official name is the State University of New York. The Big 12 reversals don’t make sense because they’re actually the University of X. So the whole joke was that even though the name is in one order, the abbreviated form is in some other order which just doesn’t make sense. Kansas State University, if it followed the Big 12’s dyslexia, should be SUK (and the jokes write themselves).
The984 - February 22, 2012
Oh, I understood the joke.
I was just sort of thinking out loud there, really.
DocSkraynj - February 23, 2012
Blah Blah Blah
In perfect conditions I doubt anyone would argue that natural turf is better than artifical grass. However, we don’t always play in perfect conditions. Natural turf is great until about mid-way through the season then it sucks. Why? The field gets chewed up and constant repainting and weather conditions become a factor. The latest versions of synthetic turf are just as good as natural grass with better drainage systems, no clumping issues (see Neyland Stadium in Oct/Nov.), look better and are easier to maintain. Ole Miss’ synthetic turf looks great and Vandy is installing their version this summer. It’s better for the players, stadium, and local communities. It’s more durable, doesn’t need to be replaced/repainted, and can create opportunities for other uses (ie HS FB Championships, concerts, etc.). UGA has a beautiful stadium and a beautiful field. All I’m saying is if it benefits other universities to upgrade their field turf then why should you care? It’s not like it’s creating a disadvantage to your ability to compete at the highest level. Isn’t that what being in the SEC is all about?
jfreudenthal - February 22, 2012
(Watch me get Kyle to pull a 180 and agree with you.)
The biggest problem, jfreudenthal, is that major soccer matches simply cannot be played on artificial turf. The ball doesn’t travel the same way over plastic grass as it does over natural grass, which means that if all football fields were replaced with artificial turf, we might set the cause of soccer in the United States back 100 years.
vineyarddawg - February 22, 2012
I can dig that point.
But I think the fact that more players get hurt on artificial turf (even more so than on grass that’s been beaten by the weather and the west of the season) is enough reason to nix it.
DocSkraynj - February 22, 2012 via mobile
Pat Dye Field
As one of Georgia’s more famous Alums and decidedly the reason for Auburn’s resurrection in the 80s, Pat Dye said it was most fitting for a piece of green, earthen real estate inside a football stadium be named after him.
Only the best things happen on grass.
DKinAU - February 22, 2012
Thanks, DKinAU.
I would, however, take issue with the claim that Pat Dye is “one of Georgia’s more famous” alumni. That, though, is a minor quibble with an otherwise fine point.
T Kyle King - February 22, 2012
Pat Who
His named was removed from the rollbooks when he accepted the position at AU…just like Muschamps was when he when to FU…
Dawg2011 - February 22, 2012
Seriously, listen to BillC
Mizzou foolishly tried to bring back the grass, to much fanfare about tradition. It was supposed to be amazing, and was done by one of the most respected athletic field sod experts in the world, who works on multiple NFL fields. It could drain 5 inches of rain in an hour and stay green well into the cold months.
And it sucked. Oh my how it sucked. It was unsuitable for the marching band, much less the football team. Players constantly slipped as the turf tore away, but more unpredictably than just a muddy field. I suppose alternatively we could put in the kind of grass that becomes brown and and turns to a slippery muddy mess by October. But I don’t think the SEC would find that very professional.
DocNice - February 22, 2012
Brown grass is why God invented green paint.
NCT - February 22, 2012
At least you don't share your field with a professional rugby team.
vineyarddawg - February 22, 2012
If they'd stop feeding . . .
the cows in the same troughs day after day they wouldn’t have those trails.
/SouthGeorgia’d
MaconDawg - February 22, 2012
If there's no grass on the field...
play in the mud.
/omits the 4 words in the middle of that joke cause it’s a family blog
Mr. Sanchez - February 22, 2012
Clearly, you're a better man than I.
NCT - February 22, 2012
So you know the joke I'm referring to? Why don't you take a seat right here....
Mr. Sanchez - February 22, 2012
Grass is the only right answer.
It’d be a shame to demolish the stadium to get proper grass to grow, and I imagine that it’s expensive to engage in anthopogenic climate modification (scientists, I hear, are unanimous), but that is the mountain you must climb.
first and thom - February 22, 2012
This better be one hell of a new TV contract.
RPT - February 22, 2012
The SEC will probably be able 15% of GDP by 2020
DocSkraynj - February 22, 2012 via mobile
Be about*
phone… grumble grumble…
DocSkraynj - February 22, 2012 via mobile
lol
longboard8 - February 24, 2012
And just becasue the staff may be craving some Podunkdawg brownies
In the SEC…Grass is the only answer.
Begin Testing NOW
Dawg2011 - February 22, 2012
My dad, now a retired coach, used to have old Kyle Field (A&M) turf in his office.
Because Kyle is the greatest piece of acreage on God’s green Earth.
longboard8 - February 24, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Dawg Sports to post a comment.