This class will not end up with the same marquee names as last year's so-called Dream Team . . . because last year's class was about injecting talent back into a program coming off a 6-7 season. This year is about filling needs.
Seth Emerson (January 26, 2012)
2011:Dream Team 2012:Ring team?
Hutson Mason (January 30, 2012)
Despite the fact that modern recruiting coverage traces its roots back to Georgia’s courtship of Herschel Walker, I have always considered covering recruiting a somewhat odd endeavor, chiefly due to the fact that any enterprise wholly dependent upon the decisionmaking of American teenage males is bound to be fraught with chaos, frustration, and unpredictability to a degree I am certain to find disconcerting. My central nervous system instinctively rebels at the notion of fretting over football in February; I am orderly enough to compartmentalize my angst, and the cubbyholes arranged throughout my brain assign football-related fretting to the period from Labor Day weekend through New Year’s Day, while reserving February for anguish over the University of Georgia’s baseball, men’s basketball, and women’s gymnastics teams.
Nevertheless, incoming freshmen are essential to the future of any group comprised of collegians, so it matters a great deal that the Georgia Bulldogs are one of nine major-conference teams to have earned an overall five-star rating, based on Rivals.com’s recruiting class rankings from 2008 to 2011. It was the latter class, of course, that brought home the "Dream Team" that validated Mark Richt’s regime, which will remain in place on Labor Day 2012, contrary to what we believed on Labor Day 2011.

Once the final list of Georgia’s 2012 signees had been completed, the Bulldogs had landed such five-star prep standouts as Josh Harvey-Clemons and John Theus, as well as such four-star players as Josh Dawson, Leonard Floyd, Todd Gurley, Jordan Jenkins, Keith Marshall, and Jonathan Taylor. (Note: I’m using Rivals rankings, for no particularly good reason; Scout and ESPN rankings may vary, but everyone agrees this was a good class, which the Worldwide Leader has touted all day as one of the five finest groups of recruits in the country.)
Coach Richt missed out on a couple of wide receiver prospects in Cordarrelle Patterson and JaQuay Williams, but he nabbed both Joshes and both Dawsons. In the end, the ‘Dawgs kept all of their commitments in the fold and snagged a couple of eleventh-hour flips, so the Red and Black met their needs by landing four defensive linemen, two linebackers, one hybrid defensive end/outside linebacker, a couple of tailbacks, a fullback, a tight end, a wide receiver, a pair of “athletes,” a punter, a placekicker, and, yes, despite the disappointing loss of Avery Young to the archrival Auburn Tigers, a trio of offensive linemen.
As Seth Emerson noted, this class is geographically diverse, which represents a significant shift from last year’s focus on corralling local talent. It is not, however, a departure from past practices, and, at the end of the day, we didn’t always get who we wanted, but we tried sometimes, and I think we’ll find we got what we needed. Where, then, does that leave us?
Go back to that link to Dr. Saturday’s breakdown of college football’s recruiting powerhouses. Nine teams earned Rivals.com’s highest rating over the last four years, those being the Alabama Crimson Tide, Florida Gators, Florida St. Seminoles, Georgia Bulldogs, LSU Tigers, Ohio St. Buckeyes, Oklahoma Sooners, Texas Longhorns, and USC Trojans, none of whom were newcomers to that distinction, as all of them have attracted top talent for years.
Since the debut of the Bowl Championship Series at the end of the 1998 college football season, the designated BCS national championship game has paired what ostensibly are the sport’s top two teams 14 times, extending invitations to a total of 28 contestants. The eight recruiting behemoths not located in Athens, Ga., received 21 of those 28 bids and won 11 of those 14 titles. In the last ten seasons, only once has the national champion not been one of those eight elite talent aggregators; heck, only once in the last nine seasons has either national championship game participant been drawn from outside those eight programs.
Of the nine universities invariably in the upper echelon on signing day, eight have won at least one national championship in the last 14 seasons; Georgia is the ninth. Of those nine clubs, eight have appeared in at least two designated BCS title tilts in the last 14 seasons; Georgia is the ninth. Modern recruiting coverage emerged from the publicity surrounding the pursuit of Herschel Walker, who delivered two national championship game appearances and one No. 1 final ranking during his three-year collegiate career, but the Bulldogs, alone among present-day elite recruiting powers, have failed to replicate that feat in recent seasons. The very highly touted have not earned rankings at the ends of their careers commensurate with those given them in the beginning.
Next autumn, there arguably will be more talented athletes wearing silver britches in Sanford Stadium than at any previous point in the Red and Black’s storied history. It is time for Georgia’s success at the highest level in early February to translate to success at the highest level in early January. 2002 produced the Bulldogs’ first SEC championship in two decades; 2012 should produce the Classic City Canines’ first national title in nearly a third of a century.
Welcome to Bulldog Nation, gentlemen. Now go win it all.
Go ‘Dawgs!
0 recs | 24 comments
Should....
gulp!
mdhenshaw - February 1, 2012
Where's the pessimism?
Am I in the right place?
TexasDawg86 - February 1, 2012
if...
Josh Harvey-Clemons changes his mind order will be restored.
mdhenshaw - February 1, 2012
A grade to me means an absolutely stellar amazing class beyond all things.
We filled a lot of needs, and that is what is important. But we lost an O Lineman, something that can’t easily be replaced in 3 years. It’s a good class, but not a great one if you use an “A” grade as hitting the moon. I would go with a B+.
tankertoad - February 1, 2012
nobody gets everybody
For a coaching staff that truly wasn’t secure in their job statuses until the next to last day in October, I’d give it an A.
Mark Mandingo - February 1, 2012 via mobile
Are you carefully reading what I wrote though? A "A" by my grading scale would be an out of this world class.
That would be a rare, rare thing. A B+ is a very strong grade given that we (mostly) filled needs.
The job status thing is a red herring, we got the dream team last year when the "job status’ was much more in question than this year. Job status is a non issue this year.
tankertoad - February 1, 2012
I see A+
as out of this world. Being in the top ten percent is A worthy. And I don’t know why you think their job statuses were more in question last year. They were all but fired in the medias’ eyes until November. That’s why we seemed to not have as many early commits. But maybe that’s just my perception.
Mark Mandingo - February 1, 2012 via mobile
Jan of last year they had just gone 6-7 and lost a bowl. Players were committing to coaches that may not be here now. That is not the case this year.
Their was no question to start 2011 their were jobs on the line. That is not the case this year. Their job status “was” in question is exactly it. It “is not” in question now. So getting the dream team last year in regards to job status was a much better pull than this year.
tankertoad - February 1, 2012
I think the red herring to analyze this based on classes rather than timing of committments....
In the period of greatest ambiguity (call it December 2010 – end of 6-7 season to September 15, 2011 around BSU/SC losses) Georgia secured commitments from the following:
For the 2011 class:
5 stars: 2/2 100% of class
4 stars: 6/12 50% of class
For the 2012 class:
5 stars 1/1 100% of class (or 1/2 if you’re optimistic about Harvey Clemons)
4 stars 2/6 33% of class
So in total in the period you would expect to be the worst UGA got:
3/3 five star recruits that they signed in the two years
8/18 four star recruits that they signed in the last two years
That’s about what Florida got in their 2012 class which is currently 3 in the country. Whichever year you attribute the results of the effort to, Georgia’s recruting during what should have been the period of highest doubt, was comparable to an elite class.
The Quincy Carter of Accountants - February 1, 2012
I wonder about timing.
It’s easy to track signing dates and commitment dates, but the seeming refrain of this year’s class was that UGA was late to the game. I don’t know enough to speak with any kind of authority, but it is at least plausible that this scenario is true: UGA “shows love” to the dream team folks starting back in 2009-2010. As the 2010 debacle unfolds, it takes lots of work to keep those early investments on track, but the coaches do a good job. But in doing so, they show inadequate love to 2012 guys, and those guys see UGA as playing pretty poorly when other teams are busy “showing the love.” Thus, the 2011 class remains strong but the foundation for the 2012 class is weak. That could also explain why we had so many signing-day decisions today – UGA usually gets the hay in barn before signing day. A late start with the 2012 guys (who were initially recruited during our program’s “period of greatest uncertainty”) caused a late finish.
I’m just guessing. Does anybody actually know?
first and thom - February 1, 2012
I like your argument there.
I think you’re definitely on to something about developing a recruiting base with guys two or three years before they sign.
Swarles_Barkley - February 1, 2012
it takes time to build relationships
kids that get interested late are more of the exception than the rule. A lot of kids probably weren’t getting too close to the staff this year because they thought they’d be gone anyway. Its harder to get a kid interested late. But that’s just my opinion. I have no facts to back it up.
Mark Mandingo - February 1, 2012 via mobile
Agreed.
If we had gotten one more 4-or-5-star offensive lineman, I would’ve bumped it up to an A.
Spears - February 1, 2012
That was EXACTLY my reasoning for the B I gave.
We got great talent across the board, but didn’t address some quality depth issues on the OL. That’s why I’m going B instead of A.
Ludakit - February 1, 2012
I really didnt like losing that guy. I am not worried about a freshman OL, I am worried about when he is a Jr and Sr.
I don’t think people truly understood how bad things were on the line – they just said “need to block better”. We were talking about drastic moves to get 5 on the line this year at one point. We already had people playing out of position and were looking to do that more.
It’s a drum I will keep on beating. Tailback U has never had a shortage of TBs (unless, well, you know, all 3 get suspended), however we seemingly always have a problem with O line depth. And FWIW, Herschel was awesome, but even Buck blocked for him upon occasion. Rewatching IC’s highlights, all he needs is to get to the second level and he can create 10-20 yards. But if our RBs can’t get past the LOS, then it doesn’t really matter.
tankertoad - February 1, 2012
My thoughts as well
in modern touchy feel terms, this is a definite smiley face class. In cold, hard terms, it’s a solid B. Not great for an A, but a good solid class.
Mr. Sanchez - February 1, 2012
I see a lone D...
anyone care to fess up and share your rationale?
I’m pretty curious about the Cs as well. It’s a pretty tough curve when a consensus top 15 class gets you a C.
Spears - February 1, 2012
Yeah, seems strange
… to be such an obvious outlier and not have anything to offer for discussion. I really would like to hear how it’s a D — not to pick a fight with that person, but to hear that perspective.
NCT - February 1, 2012
RTR!
tankertoad - February 1, 2012
I went with a solid "B"
Much like Tankertoad, I am not happy with the incoming OL numbers. Avery and one other nice OL would have nudged me to A. But after last season I saw our greatest weak link as OL.
Dawg2011 - February 1, 2012
Sorry Spears can't help you....
I have a strict policy of pleading the fifth when questioned about suspicous C’s, D’s and tough curves which may or may not be the result of my internet activity.
/I’ll show myself out
The Quincy Carter of Accountants - February 1, 2012
Easily explainable.
Kyle forgot to include the option “trolls vote here.”
vineyarddawg - February 1, 2012
Incomplete...
Have to wait for the JHC drama to play out. If his LOI arrives, I’d give this class an A-…otherwise a B+. Outside of one more offensive lineman, we’ve addressed our needs.
I never thought Patterson was going to come here. We’re absolutely stacked at receiver at the moment, with guys like Nick Marshall and Justin Scott-Wesley itching to show what they can do as RS Freshman. He’ll play a season at Tennessee and move on.
This is a very solid class and some high character guys. I like it.
DavetheDawg - February 1, 2012
Nick Marshall's not a redshirt freshman.
He played last year.
T Kyle King - February 1, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Dawg Sports to post a comment.